CET 2008 Analysis [Archive] - Peak Seekers for Indian MBA Entrance Exams

View Full Version : CET 2008 Analysis

Manish Salian

26th March 2008, 11:28 PM

Hi,

It took me some time to compile this analysis but I believe it is one of the most accurate analysis:

Total Number of students who took CET = 74,622* (All India)

* The above figure is official as it is right from horse's mouth i.e. DTE. Last year it was 59,078 and in 2006 it was 52,211.

Here are the number of students above you all India, based on your written test scores:

158+ 7 students
155+ 15 students
154+ 22 students
153+ 37 students
152+ 45 students
151+ 52 students
150+ 67 students
149+ 75 students
148+ 97 students
147+ 112 students
146+ 129 students
145+ 149 students
144+ 172 students
143+ 194 students
142+ 231 students
141+ 269 students
140+ 321 students
139+ 366 students
138+ 418 students
137+ 478 students
136+ 537 students
134+ 649 students
133+ 746 students
131+ 940 students
130+ 1045 students
129+ 1164 students
128+ 1283 students
127+ 1440 students
126+ 1567 students
125+ 1716 students
124+ 1858 students
123+ 2037 students
122+ 2216 students
121+ 2395 students
120+ 2619 students
119+ 2843 students
117+ 3335 students
115+ 3873 students
114+ 4156 students
113+ 4432 students
112+ 4731 students
111+ 5037 students
109+ 5739 students
107+ 6522 students
106+ 6910 students
105+ 6783 students
104+ 7694 students

Regards,

Manish Sir

Manish Salian

27th March 2008, 12:51 PM

Hi,

Here is an interesting piece of analysis! It will give you an idea about what your Mumbai Rank could turn out to be (after GD-PI) based on your present percentile!

It gives you information about:

1. Number of All India students above at each percentile last year (AIR),

2. Best and Worst Mumbai Rank (after GD-PI) secured by these students (BEST MR and WORST MR).

99.99 %ile (Written score: 145+) - AIR: 7, BEST MR: 1, WORST MR: 5

99.98 %ile (Written Score: 143) - AIR: 12, BEST MR: 6, WORST MR: 27

99.97 %ile (Written Score: 141) - AIR: 18, BEST MR: 7, WORST MR: 10

99.96 %ile (Written Score: 140) - AIR: 24, BEST MR: 14, WORST MR: 16

99.95 %ile (Written Score: 139) - AIR: 30, BEST MR: 20, WORST MR: 45

99.93 %ile (Written Score: 138) - AIR: 41, BEST MR: 19, WORST MR: 46

99.92 %ile (Written Score: 137) - AIR: 47, BEST MR: 22, WORST MR: 70

99.90 %ile (Written Score: 136) - AIR: 59, BEST MR: 18, WORST MR: 158

99.87 %ile (Written Score: 135) - AIR: 77, BEST MR: 24, WORST MR: 131

99.84 %ile (Written Score: 134) - AIR: 95, BEST MR: 25, WORST MR: 95

99.80 %ile (Written Score: 133) - AIR: 118, BEST MR: 26, WORST MR: 181

99.75 %ile (Written Score: 132) - AIR: 148, BEST MR: 39, WORST MR: 368

99.71 %ile (Written Score: 131) - AIR: 171, BEST MR: 53, WORST MR: 269

99.65 %ile (Written Score: 130) - AIR: 207, BEST MR: 82, WORST MR: 204

99.59 %ile (Written Score: 129) - AIR: 242, BEST MR: 84, WORST MR: 304

99.52 %ile (Written Score: 128) - AIR: 284, BEST MR: 85, WORST MR: 449

99.44 %ile (Written Score: 127) - AIR: 331, BEST MR: 150, WORST MR: 333

99.32 %ile (Written Score: 126) - AIR: 402, BEST MR: 127, WORST MR: 373

99.21 %ile (Written Score: 125) - AIR: 467, BEST MR: 156, WORST MR: 453

99.10 %ile (Written Score: 124) - AIR: 532, BEST MR: 199, WORST MR: 458

98.97 %ile (Written Score: 123) - AIR: 609, BEST MR: 180, WORST MR: 499

98.85 %ile (Written Score: 122) - AIR: 679, BEST MR: 265, WORST MR: 547

98.70 %ile (Written Score: 121) - AIR: 768, BEST MR: 202, WORST MR: 643

98.58 %ile (Written Score: 120) - AIR: 839, BEST MR: 325, WORST MR: 584

98.43 %ile (Written Score: 119) - AIR: 928, BEST MR: 362, WORST MR: 651

98.27 %ile (Written Score: 118) - AIR: 1022, BEST MR: 443, WORST MR: 652

98.09 %ile (Written Score: 117) - AIR: 1128, BEST MR: 446, WORST MR: 659

97.85 %ile (Written Score: 116) - AIR: 1270, BEST MR: 367, WORST MR: 613

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

27th March 2008, 01:15 PM

Hi,

In 2007, the last student to get admitted to Bajaj (in Open Category, Home University) was Anay Dhoraje (A Peak Seekers student ;) ). His Written score was 135 (99.87 %ile) and his final Mumbai rank was 41.

However, there was a candidate named Gautam Jain, who got admitted to Bajaj with a written score of 132 (99.75 %ile) and a final Mumbai rank of 39. This is so because, he got a whopping 35 on 40 in his GD-PI (GD - 14, PI - 16, WE - 1, PAR - 4). Now, someone should ask him what his GD centre was? :)

This means, it was possible to get into Bajaj (though difficult), with a percentile of 99.75 last year (with 148 people above you All India).

This year, 149 people are above you at a score 145. This means, though a remote possibility, everyone above 145 stands a realistic chance of getting Bajaj, but should give more than 100% in their GD-PI.

Also, one should look at the other side of the story. Last year another student (name witheld) with a written score of 139 and a percentile of 99.95 (30 All India students above her), landed up in Sydenham with a final Mumbai Rank of 45 (GD - 9, PI - 13, PAR - 4, Total - 26). It is case of so near, yet so far! So, everyone above 150, do not take it too lightly!

Others can work out similar scenarios based on your percentile this year!

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

27th March 2008, 01:41 PM

Hi,

Here are the Final cut-off's for last year (Overall marks after GD-PI):

Jamnalal Bajaj: 166 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 149)
(Last Candidate: Anay Dhoraje, Written Score: 135, 99.87 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 41)

Sydenham MMS: 162 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 145)
(Last Candidate: Anand Naik, Written Score: 132, 99.75 %ile, GD-PI: 30, Final MU Rank: 89)

Sydenham PG: 158 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 145)
(Last Candidate: Kunal Shah, Written Score: 133, 99.80 %ile, GD-PI: 25, Final MU Rank: 160)

Welingkar: 157 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 140)
(Last Candidate: Murtuza Patrawala, Written Score: 125, 99.21 %ile, GD-PI: 32, Final MU Rank: 197)

Somaiya: 156 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 139)
(Last Candidate: Binu Thomas, Written Score: 126, 99.32 %ile, GD-PI: 30, Final MU Rank: 215)

SIES: 155 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 138)
(Last Candidate: Gaurav Thakkar, Written Score: 127, 99.44 %ile, GD-PI: 28, Final MU Rank: 249)

MET: 146 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 133)
(Last Candidate: Anita Rohra, Written Score: 121, 98.70 %ile, GD-PI: 25, Final MU Rank: 584)

Dalmia: 144 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 127)
(Last Candidate: Priyanka Jain, Written Score: 114, 97.44 %ile, GD-PI: 30, Final MU Rank: 707)

Chetana's: 143 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 125)
(Last Candidate: Urvashi Darira, Written Score: 112, 96.90 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 772)

IES: 140 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 125)
(Last Candidate: Harshad Sawant, Written Score: 116, 97.85 %ile, GD-PI: 24, Final MU Rank: 931)

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

27th March 2008, 02:24 PM

Hi,

Living up to the tradition, many Peak Seekers students have figured in the 99.5%ile + list even this year.

This is primarily a result of the fact that CET 2008 was a replica of Peak Seekers PrepCET's. To know about, how close the Peak Seekers tests were close to the actual CET 2008, read the following link:

http://www.peakseekers.in/CET-2008-Analysis.html

Here is a list of our students (who have confirmed their scores with us), who are in the 99.5 percentile club:

Puneet Tulsyan : Written Score: 158, Percentile: 99.99

Biren Master : Written Score: 154, Percentile: 99.97

Sagar Satra: Written Score: 154, Percentile: 99.97

Ankit Prakash: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95

Neerav Makwana: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95

Rahul P. L.: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95

Viral Vora: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95

Bijoy Shah: Written Score: 152, Percentile: 99.94

Nikhil Tulsian: Written Score: 152, Percentile: 99.94

Bhupendra Vira: Written Score: 151, Percentile: 99.93

Siddhesh Jaikar: Written Score: 150, Percentile: 99.91

Ashish Shah: Written Score: 149, Percentile: 99.90

Abhishek Tibrewal: Written Score: 147, Percentile: 99.85

Rutu Shah: Written Score: 147, Percentile: 99.85

Devanshi Vaishnav: Written Score: 146, Percentile: 99.83

Vikas Kappe: Written Score: 146, Percentile: 99.83

Sonal Padgaonkar: Written Score: 145, Percentile: 99.80

Dhruvesh Sanghvi: Written Score: 145, Percentile: 99.80

Harshil Suvarnkar: Written Score: 145, Percentile: 99.80

Aditya Bagarka: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77

Apurva Nahata: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77

Karishma Savla: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77

Kriti Tater: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77

Merup Kapadia: Written Score: 143, Percentile: 99.74

Akshay Amberkar: Written Score: 142, Percentile: 99.69

Shridhar Raikar: Written Score: 142, Percentile: 99.69

Fakhri Kaydawala: Written Score: 140, Percentile: 99.57

Neelav Agarwal: Written Score: 140, Percentile: 99.57

Suhas Pinto: Written Score: 140, Percentile: 99.57

Richa Kulkarni: Written Score: 139, Percentile: 99.51

Note:

The ones marked in Blue are (according to me) in 'Suraksha Chakra' and a decent GD-PI performance should take them through Bajaj (approx 28/40)

The ones marked in Red are in 'Danger Zone' . They need a really good GD-PI round to take them through Bajaj (approx 34/40)

The ones marked in Green seem unlikely to make it to Bajaj. But they should give their best shot at GD to get into the better of the top 4 colleges.

Just to keep you informed, The GD-PI batches at Peak Seekers are starting 1st Week of April. We will keep you updated on the same.

Non-Peak Seekers students may call on 98202 27841, 2610 8001, 2610 8002 for the GD-PI batches.

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

28th March 2008, 10:16 AM

Hi,

I am surprised as to why is everyone basing his calculations on the last years results (i.e. CET 2007). The fact is that,this year's results are similar to that in 2006 (and not to that in 2007). Just have a look:

All India Rank 50: Written Score 151 in 2008 and 148 in 2006

All India Rank 100: Written Score 147 in 2008 and 145 in 2006

All India Rank 150: Written Score 144 in 2008 and 143 in 2006

All India Rank 200: Written Score 142 in 2008 and 141 in 2006

All India Rank 250: Written Score 141 in 2008 and 139 in 2006

All India Rank 300: Written Score 140 in 2008 and 138 in 2006

All India Rank 350: Written Score 139 in 2008 and 137 in 2006

All India Rank 400: Written Score 138 in 2008 and 136 in 2006

All India Rank 450: Written Score 137 in 2008 and 135 in 2006

All India Rank 500: Written Score 136 in 2008 and 134 in 2006

All India Rank 550: Written Score 134 in 2008 and 133 in 2006

All India Rank 600: Written Score 134 in 2008 and 133 in 2006

All India Rank 650: Written Score 133 in 2008 and 132 in 2006

All India Rank 700: Written Score 133 in 2008 and 132 in 2006

All India Rank 750: Written Score 132 in 2008 and 131 in 2006

All India Rank 800: Written Score 131 in 2008 and 130 in 2006

All India Rank 850: Written Score 131 in 2008 and 130 in 2006

All India Rank 900: Written Score 131 in 2008 and 129 in 2006

All India Rank 950: Written Score 130 in 2008 and 129 in 2006

All India Rank 1000: Written Score 130 in 2008 and 128 in 2006

You can see that the scores are neck to neck, with 2008 scores being 1-2 marks more than the 2006 scores.

This means, it is very much likely that final cut-off's of different institutes this year will be 1-2 more than that in 2006. Of course, this is assuming that the average performance of students in GD-PI is similar to that 2 years back!

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

28th March 2008, 10:48 AM

Hi,

Based on the cut-off's in 2006, here are the institute-wise likely cut-off's (after GD-PI) for CET 2008:

Jamnalal Bajaj: 180
(Last Candidate in 2006: Ketki Guttikar*, Final Score: 177, Written Score: 139, 99.48 %ile, GD-PI: 38, Final MU Rank: 41)

*Note: Check out her GD-PI scores, 38/40. The exact beakup is: GD: 16, PI: 17, PAR: 4, WE: 1). Wow! No wonder she got into Bajaj at a written percentile of 99.48! This should give some hopes to even those at 142 this year. Nothing is Impossible!

Sydenham MMS: 175
(Last Candidate in 2006: Reshmi Nair*, Final Score: 173, Written Score: 139, 99.48 %ile, GD-PI: 34, Final MU Rank: 83)

*Note: Both Reshmi and Ketki had similar scores in written, i.e. 139, but one of them secured the last seat in Bajaj and the other one last seat in Sydenham. Wah re kaamdev, wah re kismet!

Welingkar: 170
(Last Candidate in 2006: Riddhi Joshi, Final Score: 168, Written Score: 137, 99.28 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 167)

Somaiya: 167
(Last Candidate in 2006: Sachin Jain, Final Score: 165, Written Score: 132, 98.64 %ile, GD-PI: 33, Final MU Rank: 229)

Sydenham PG: 166
(Last Candidate in 2006: Rohan Karkare, Final Score: 165, Written Score: 134, 98.95 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 225)

SIES: 160
(Last Candidate in 2006: Aditi Trehan, Final Score: 159, Written Score: 124, 97.04 %ile, GD-PI: 35, Final MU Rank: 410)

Dalmia: 158
(Last Candidate in 2006: Vivek Rathi, Final Score: 155, Written Score: 128, 97.94 %ile, GD-PI: 27, Final MU Rank: 534)

MET: 157
(Last Candidate in 2006: Plaha Amrit Kaur, Final Score: 157, Written Score: 122, 96.44 %ile, GD-PI: 35, Final MU Rank: 467)

Chetana's: 156
(Last Candidate in 2006: Kruti Dalal, Final Score: 157, Written Score: 130, 98.35 %ile, GD-PI: 27, Final MU Rank: 446)

IES: 154
(Last Candidate in 2006: Sonali Gokhale, Final Score: 153, Written Score: 120, 95.82 %ile, GD-PI: 33, Final MU Rank: 643)

Note that I have also factored in the changes that have happened to the Brand Value of the different institutes in the two years. For eg. Chetana closed over MET and Dalmia two years back. I believe, this year it will close behind both of them.

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

28th March 2008, 12:15 PM

Hi,

Here is a list of colleges that you should expect, based on whether your performance in GD-PI is Excellent, Average or Poor:

Excellent GD-PI: 32+/40

Average GD-PI: 27-32/40

Poor GD-PI: below 27/40

Your Written Score is 157+
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Bajaj
Poor GD-PI: Bajaj

Your Written Score is 152 to 157
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Bajaj
Poor GD-PI: Sydenham

Your Written Score is 151
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya

Your Written Score is 150
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya

Your Written Score is 149
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya

Your Written Score is 148
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya

Your Written Score is 147
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj
Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya

Your Written Score is 146
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG

Your Written Score is 145
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES

Your Written Score is 144
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES

Your Written Score is 143
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES

Your Written Score is 142
Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES

Your Written Score is 141
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES

Your Written Score is 140
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya
Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES

Your Written Score is 139
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG
Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia

Your Written Score is 138
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia

Your Written Score is 137
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET

Your Written Score is 136
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana

Your Written Score is 135
Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES

Your Written Score is 134
Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya
Average GD-PI: Sydenham PG, SIES
Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES

Your Written Score is 133
Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG
Average GD-PI: SIES
Poor GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10

Your Written Score is 132
Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia
Poor GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10

Your Written Score is 131
Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia
Poor GD-PI: MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10

Your Written Score is 130
Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES
Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET
Poor GD-PI: Chetana, IES and Below top 10

Your Written Score is 129
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham PG, SIES
Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana
Poor GD-PI: IES and Below top 10

Your Written Score is 128
Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham PG, SIES
Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES
Poor GD-PI: IES and Below top 10

Your Written Score is 127
Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia
Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 126
Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia
Average GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 125
Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia
Average GD-PI: MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 124
Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET
Average GD-PI: Chetana, IES and Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 123
Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana
Average GD-PI: IES and Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 122
Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES
Average GD-PI: IES and Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 121
Excellent GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 120
Excellent GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 119
Excellent GD-PI: MET, Chetana, IES
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 118
Excellent GD-PI: Chetana, IES
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 117
Excellent GD-PI: IES
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is 116
Excellent GD-PI: IES
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Your Written Score is below 116
Excellent GD-PI: Below top 10
Average GD-PI: Below top 10
Poor GD-PI: Below top 10

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

28th March 2008, 12:18 PM

Hi,

Now, the above thread gives you a very clear picture of the possible colleges that you could get into!

At the end of the day, moral of the story is, 'Excel in GD-PI and get better college' (Now, that's common sense, isn't it?:) ).

So stop analyzing the results further, and start preparing for your GD-PI!

All the best!

Regards,

Manish sir

KumarShah

28th March 2008, 01:36 PM

DevanshiVaishnav

28th March 2008, 03:03 PM

Manish Salian

28th March 2008, 10:33 PM

hello sir kumar here i am last year peakseeker student but last l got only 98 in CET but this year with one year work exp i got 132 in CET 2008 n sir i gave sies pg test also so i want ask u if i get call frm sies pg then what to do ?? means can i go mms or sies pg n according to placement and faculty wise sies mms is good or pg plz guide sir bye tc

Hi Kumar,

Nice to hear from you after a long time! And congratulations on your improvement in score this year.

Let me get your question correctly - You are asking, whether SIES MMS is good or PG is good, right?

As long as the choice is between two courses of the same college, it is always better to go for MMS, as a University Degree is always reliable in the long run. Yes, I have heard stories that some institutes are promoting their PG programs over MMS program (and favoring PG students over MMS students), but I doubt whether the resources and faculty would be different for the two programs. It is always better to stick with a Degree over a Diploma.

Besides, if you secure a seat in a PG program of some institute and later get admission into the MMS program of the same institute in CAP rounds, there are less hassles about refund, as they transfer the fees internally!

So, if you get into SIES MMS and PG both, go for MMS.

I hope, I have answered you. Thanks for writing. Keep posting!

Regards,

Manish sir

Manish Salian

28th March 2008, 10:37 PM

Wow sir!!! Excellent analysis and very helpful too...:)
Thank you so much... I am sure this will help a lot of people to get a clear picture of where they could probably stand... Also, I am sure this would be more or less the scenario considering your accurate analysis in the past 2 yrs... Keep us Posted !!!!

Thanks Devanshi,

What's the use of my experience of 10 years, if I am not able to give our students the accurate picture.

All of you can keep me posted for any personal counseling that you may require regards your scores and admissions.

Regards,

Manish sir

KumarShah

30th March 2008, 02:46 PM

Manish Salian

30th March 2008, 10:24 PM

hi sir hows life going kumar here again sir i got ur reply u said mms is useful us for long term rather then pg but i heard that pg course is more industrial oriented rather then mms means there subject is quite different what u think about that ?? n nowadays colleges also more preferred there pg students for industry interference n for placement also so can we go for pg or mms ?? i know pg frm khalsa athrav IES is not much useful for long term n they dont have any good reputation in market but what u think sies pg because for 120 sits they got thousands of application why that craze of pg nowadays increasing in students sir plz guide us thnx bye tc

Hi Kumar,

Yes, that is a good point that PG program is industry oriented and has contemporary subjects! But as a management student, you are anyways required to keep track of things happening around you and latest and contemporary issues (be it a PG student or a MMS one)! One would be a fool to stick to the prescribed syllabus! I mean, MBA is not about cramming a few books, filling the answer sheets and passing exams. At the end of the day you are doing a lot of case studies, presentations, projects and participating in may academic oriented events! All of these help you to keep updated with the contemporary issues.

Regards,

Manish sir

KumarShah

31st March 2008, 01:03 PM

thnx sir for ur prompt reply so i tried first first for mms programme if i get institutes like MET IES dalmia then can i go for sies pg or still stick with this institutes according to ur analysis according to average gd pi i will get this colleges so what can i do in this situation plz reply sir bye tc