![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
It took me some time to compile this analysis but I believe it is one of the most accurate analysis: Total Number of students who took CET = 74,622* (All India) * The above figure is official as it is right from horse's mouth i.e. DTE. Last year it was 59,078 and in 2006 it was 52,211. Here are the number of students above you all India, based on your written test scores: 158+ 7 students 155+ 15 students 154+ 22 students 153+ 37 students 152+ 45 students 151+ 52 students 150+ 67 students 149+ 75 students 148+ 97 students 147+ 112 students 146+ 129 students 145+ 149 students 144+ 172 students 143+ 194 students 142+ 231 students 141+ 269 students 140+ 321 students 139+ 366 students 138+ 418 students 137+ 478 students 136+ 537 students 134+ 649 students 133+ 746 students 131+ 940 students 130+ 1045 students 129+ 1164 students 128+ 1283 students 127+ 1440 students 126+ 1567 students 125+ 1716 students 124+ 1858 students 123+ 2037 students 122+ 2216 students 121+ 2395 students 120+ 2619 students 119+ 2843 students 117+ 3335 students 115+ 3873 students 114+ 4156 students 113+ 4432 students 112+ 4731 students 111+ 5037 students 109+ 5739 students 107+ 6522 students 106+ 6910 students 105+ 6783 students 104+ 7694 students Regards, Manish Sir |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Here is an interesting piece of analysis! It will give you an idea about what your Mumbai Rank could turn out to be (after GD-PI) based on your present percentile! It gives you information about: 1. Number of All India students above at each percentile last year (AIR), 2. Best and Worst Mumbai Rank (after GD-PI) secured by these students (BEST MR and WORST MR). 99.99 %ile (Written score: 145+) - AIR: 7, BEST MR: 1, WORST MR: 5 99.98 %ile (Written Score: 143) - AIR: 12, BEST MR: 6, WORST MR: 27 99.97 %ile (Written Score: 141) - AIR: 18, BEST MR: 7, WORST MR: 10 99.96 %ile (Written Score: 140) - AIR: 24, BEST MR: 14, WORST MR: 16 99.95 %ile (Written Score: 139) - AIR: 30, BEST MR: 20, WORST MR: 45 99.93 %ile (Written Score: 138) - AIR: 41, BEST MR: 19, WORST MR: 46 99.92 %ile (Written Score: 137) - AIR: 47, BEST MR: 22, WORST MR: 70 99.90 %ile (Written Score: 136) - AIR: 59, BEST MR: 18, WORST MR: 158 99.87 %ile (Written Score: 135) - AIR: 77, BEST MR: 24, WORST MR: 131 99.84 %ile (Written Score: 134) - AIR: 95, BEST MR: 25, WORST MR: 95 99.80 %ile (Written Score: 133) - AIR: 118, BEST MR: 26, WORST MR: 181 99.75 %ile (Written Score: 132) - AIR: 148, BEST MR: 39, WORST MR: 368 99.71 %ile (Written Score: 131) - AIR: 171, BEST MR: 53, WORST MR: 269 99.65 %ile (Written Score: 130) - AIR: 207, BEST MR: 82, WORST MR: 204 99.59 %ile (Written Score: 129) - AIR: 242, BEST MR: 84, WORST MR: 304 99.52 %ile (Written Score: 128) - AIR: 284, BEST MR: 85, WORST MR: 449 99.44 %ile (Written Score: 127) - AIR: 331, BEST MR: 150, WORST MR: 333 99.32 %ile (Written Score: 126) - AIR: 402, BEST MR: 127, WORST MR: 373 99.21 %ile (Written Score: 125) - AIR: 467, BEST MR: 156, WORST MR: 453 99.10 %ile (Written Score: 124) - AIR: 532, BEST MR: 199, WORST MR: 458 98.97 %ile (Written Score: 123) - AIR: 609, BEST MR: 180, WORST MR: 499 98.85 %ile (Written Score: 122) - AIR: 679, BEST MR: 265, WORST MR: 547 98.70 %ile (Written Score: 121) - AIR: 768, BEST MR: 202, WORST MR: 643 98.58 %ile (Written Score: 120) - AIR: 839, BEST MR: 325, WORST MR: 584 98.43 %ile (Written Score: 119) - AIR: 928, BEST MR: 362, WORST MR: 651 98.27 %ile (Written Score: 118) - AIR: 1022, BEST MR: 443, WORST MR: 652 98.09 %ile (Written Score: 117) - AIR: 1128, BEST MR: 446, WORST MR: 659 97.85 %ile (Written Score: 116) - AIR: 1270, BEST MR: 367, WORST MR: 613 Regards, Manish sir |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
In 2007, the last student to get admitted to Bajaj (in Open Category, Home University) was Anay Dhoraje (A Peak Seekers student ). His Written score was 135 (99.87 %ile) and his final Mumbai rank was 41.However, there was a candidate named Gautam Jain, who got admitted to Bajaj with a written score of 132 (99.75 %ile) and a final Mumbai rank of 39. This is so because, he got a whopping 35 on 40 in his GD-PI (GD - 14, PI - 16, WE - 1, PAR - 4). Now, someone should ask him what his GD centre was? ![]() This means, it was possible to get into Bajaj (though difficult), with a percentile of 99.75 last year (with 148 people above you All India). This year, 149 people are above you at a score 145. This means, though a remote possibility, everyone above 145 stands a realistic chance of getting Bajaj, but should give more than 100% in their GD-PI. Also, one should look at the other side of the story. Last year another student (name witheld) with a written score of 139 and a percentile of 99.95 (30 All India students above her), landed up in Sydenham with a final Mumbai Rank of 45 (GD - 9, PI - 13, PAR - 4, Total - 26). It is case of so near, yet so far! So, everyone above 150, do not take it too lightly! Others can work out similar scenarios based on your percentile this year! Regards, Manish sir Last edited by Ajeet : 12th April 2008 at 07:32 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Here are the Final cut-off's for last year (Overall marks after GD-PI): Jamnalal Bajaj: 166 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 149) (Last Candidate: Anay Dhoraje, Written Score: 135, 99.87 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 41) Sydenham MMS: 162 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 145) (Last Candidate: Anand Naik, Written Score: 132, 99.75 %ile, GD-PI: 30, Final MU Rank: 89) Sydenham PG: 158 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 145) (Last Candidate: Kunal Shah, Written Score: 133, 99.80 %ile, GD-PI: 25, Final MU Rank: 160) Welingkar: 157 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 140) (Last Candidate: Murtuza Patrawala, Written Score: 125, 99.21 %ile, GD-PI: 32, Final MU Rank: 197) Somaiya: 156 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 139) (Last Candidate: Binu Thomas, Written Score: 126, 99.32 %ile, GD-PI: 30, Final MU Rank: 215) SIES: 155 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 138) (Last Candidate: Gaurav Thakkar, Written Score: 127, 99.44 %ile, GD-PI: 28, Final MU Rank: 249) MET: 146 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 133) (Last Candidate: Anita Rohra, Written Score: 121, 98.70 %ile, GD-PI: 25, Final MU Rank: 584) Dalmia: 144 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 127) (Last Candidate: Priyanka Jain, Written Score: 114, 97.44 %ile, GD-PI: 30, Final MU Rank: 707) Chetana's: 143 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 125) (Last Candidate: Urvashi Darira, Written Score: 112, 96.90 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 772) IES: 140 (This Years Equivalent Written score: 125) (Last Candidate: Harshad Sawant, Written Score: 116, 97.85 %ile, GD-PI: 24, Final MU Rank: 931) Regards, Manish sir |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Living up to the tradition, many Peak Seekers students have figured in the 99.5%ile + list even this year. This is primarily a result of the fact that CET 2008 was a replica of Peak Seekers PrepCET's. To know about, how close the Peak Seekers tests were close to the actual CET 2008, read the following link: Here is a list of our students (who have confirmed their scores with us), who are in the 99.5 percentile club: Puneet Tulsyan : Written Score: 158, Percentile: 99.99 Biren Master : Written Score: 154, Percentile: 99.97 Sagar Satra: Written Score: 154, Percentile: 99.97 Ankit Prakash: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95 Neerav Makwana: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95 Rahul P. L.: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95 Viral Vora: Written Score: 153, Percentile: 99.95 Bijoy Shah: Written Score: 152, Percentile: 99.94 Nikhil Tulsian: Written Score: 152, Percentile: 99.94 Bhupendra Vira: Written Score: 151, Percentile: 99.93 Siddhesh Jaikar: Written Score: 150, Percentile: 99.91 Ashish Shah: Written Score: 149, Percentile: 99.90 Abhishek Tibrewal: Written Score: 147, Percentile: 99.85 Rutu Shah: Written Score: 147, Percentile: 99.85 Devanshi Vaishnav: Written Score: 146, Percentile: 99.83 Vikas Kappe: Written Score: 146, Percentile: 99.83 Sonal Padgaonkar: Written Score: 145, Percentile: 99.80 Dhruvesh Sanghvi: Written Score: 145, Percentile: 99.80 Harshil Suvarnkar: Written Score: 145, Percentile: 99.80 Aditya Bagarka: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77 Apurva Nahata: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77 Karishma Savla: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77 Kriti Tater: Written Score: 144, Percentile: 99.77 Merup Kapadia: Written Score: 143, Percentile: 99.74 Akshay Amberkar: Written Score: 142, Percentile: 99.69 Shridhar Raikar: Written Score: 142, Percentile: 99.69 Fakhri Kaydawala: Written Score: 140, Percentile: 99.57 Neelav Agarwal: Written Score: 140, Percentile: 99.57 Suhas Pinto: Written Score: 140, Percentile: 99.57 Richa Kulkarni: Written Score: 139, Percentile: 99.51 Note: The ones marked in Blue are (according to me) in 'Suraksha Chakra' and a decent GD-PI performance should take them through Bajaj (approx 28/40) The ones marked in Red are in 'Danger Zone' . They need a really good GD-PI round to take them through Bajaj (approx 34/40) The ones marked in Green seem unlikely to make it to Bajaj. But they should give their best shot at GD to get into the better of the top 4 colleges. Just to keep you informed, The GD-PI batches at Peak Seekers are starting 1st Week of April. We will keep you updated on the same. Non-Peak Seekers students may call on 98202 27841, 2610 8001, 2610 8002 for the GD-PI batches. Regards, Manish sir |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I am surprised as to why is everyone basing his calculations on the last years results (i.e. CET 2007). The fact is that,this year's results are similar to that in 2006 (and not to that in 2007). Just have a look: All India Rank 50: Written Score 151 in 2008 and 148 in 2006 All India Rank 100: Written Score 147 in 2008 and 145 in 2006 All India Rank 150: Written Score 144 in 2008 and 143 in 2006 All India Rank 200: Written Score 142 in 2008 and 141 in 2006 All India Rank 250: Written Score 141 in 2008 and 139 in 2006 All India Rank 300: Written Score 140 in 2008 and 138 in 2006 All India Rank 350: Written Score 139 in 2008 and 137 in 2006 All India Rank 400: Written Score 138 in 2008 and 136 in 2006 All India Rank 450: Written Score 137 in 2008 and 135 in 2006 All India Rank 500: Written Score 136 in 2008 and 134 in 2006 All India Rank 550: Written Score 134 in 2008 and 133 in 2006 All India Rank 600: Written Score 134 in 2008 and 133 in 2006 All India Rank 650: Written Score 133 in 2008 and 132 in 2006 All India Rank 700: Written Score 133 in 2008 and 132 in 2006 All India Rank 750: Written Score 132 in 2008 and 131 in 2006 All India Rank 800: Written Score 131 in 2008 and 130 in 2006 All India Rank 850: Written Score 131 in 2008 and 130 in 2006 All India Rank 900: Written Score 131 in 2008 and 129 in 2006 All India Rank 950: Written Score 130 in 2008 and 129 in 2006 All India Rank 1000: Written Score 130 in 2008 and 128 in 2006 You can see that the scores are neck to neck, with 2008 scores being 1-2 marks more than the 2006 scores. This means, it is very much likely that final cut-off's of different institutes this year will be 1-2 more than that in 2006. Of course, this is assuming that the average performance of students in GD-PI is similar to that 2 years back! Regards, Manish sir |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Based on the cut-off's in 2006, here are the institute-wise likely cut-off's (after GD-PI) for CET 2008: Jamnalal Bajaj: 180 (Last Candidate in 2006: Ketki Guttikar*, Final Score: 177, Written Score: 139, 99.48 %ile, GD-PI: 38, Final MU Rank: 41) *Note: Check out her GD-PI scores, 38/40. The exact beakup is: GD: 16, PI: 17, PAR: 4, WE: 1). Wow! No wonder she got into Bajaj at a written percentile of 99.48! This should give some hopes to even those at 142 this year. Nothing is Impossible! Sydenham MMS: 175 (Last Candidate in 2006: Reshmi Nair*, Final Score: 173, Written Score: 139, 99.48 %ile, GD-PI: 34, Final MU Rank: 83) *Note: Both Reshmi and Ketki had similar scores in written, i.e. 139, but one of them secured the last seat in Bajaj and the other one last seat in Sydenham. Wah re kaamdev, wah re kismet! Welingkar: 170 (Last Candidate in 2006: Riddhi Joshi, Final Score: 168, Written Score: 137, 99.28 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 167) Somaiya: 167 (Last Candidate in 2006: Sachin Jain, Final Score: 165, Written Score: 132, 98.64 %ile, GD-PI: 33, Final MU Rank: 229) Sydenham PG: 166 (Last Candidate in 2006: Rohan Karkare, Final Score: 165, Written Score: 134, 98.95 %ile, GD-PI: 31, Final MU Rank: 225) SIES: 160 (Last Candidate in 2006: Aditi Trehan, Final Score: 159, Written Score: 124, 97.04 %ile, GD-PI: 35, Final MU Rank: 410) Dalmia: 158 (Last Candidate in 2006: Vivek Rathi, Final Score: 155, Written Score: 128, 97.94 %ile, GD-PI: 27, Final MU Rank: 534) MET: 157 (Last Candidate in 2006: Plaha Amrit Kaur, Final Score: 157, Written Score: 122, 96.44 %ile, GD-PI: 35, Final MU Rank: 467) Chetana's: 156 (Last Candidate in 2006: Kruti Dalal, Final Score: 157, Written Score: 130, 98.35 %ile, GD-PI: 27, Final MU Rank: 446) IES: 154 (Last Candidate in 2006: Sonali Gokhale, Final Score: 153, Written Score: 120, 95.82 %ile, GD-PI: 33, Final MU Rank: 643) Note that I have also factored in the changes that have happened to the Brand Value of the different institutes in the two years. For eg. Chetana closed over MET and Dalmia two years back. I believe, this year it will close behind both of them. Regards, Manish sir |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Here is a list of colleges that you should expect, based on whether your performance in GD-PI is Excellent, Average or Poor: Excellent GD-PI: 32+/40 Average GD-PI: 27-32/40 Poor GD-PI: below 27/40 Your Written Score is 157+ Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Bajaj Poor GD-PI: Bajaj Your Written Score is 152 to 157 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Bajaj Poor GD-PI: Sydenham Your Written Score is 151 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Your Written Score is 150 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Your Written Score is 149 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Your Written Score is 148 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Poor GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Your Written Score is 147 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya Your Written Score is 146 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG Your Written Score is 145 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Your Written Score is 144 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Your Written Score is 143 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Average GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Your Written Score is 142 Excellent GD-PI: Bajaj, Sydenham Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Your Written Score is 141 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Your Written Score is 140 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya Poor GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Your Written Score is 139 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Your Written Score is 138 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Your Written Score is 137 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET Your Written Score is 136 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham, Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana Your Written Score is 135 Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Your Written Score is 134 Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya Average GD-PI: Sydenham PG, SIES Poor GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Your Written Score is 133 Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG Average GD-PI: SIES Poor GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Your Written Score is 132 Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Poor GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Your Written Score is 131 Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Poor GD-PI: MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Your Written Score is 130 Excellent GD-PI: Welingkar, Somaiya, Sydenham PG, SIES Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET Poor GD-PI: Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Your Written Score is 129 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham PG, SIES Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana Poor GD-PI: IES and Below top 10 Your Written Score is 128 Excellent GD-PI: Sydenham PG, SIES Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Poor GD-PI: IES and Below top 10 Your Written Score is 127 Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Average GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 126 Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Average GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 125 Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia Average GD-PI: MET, Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 124 Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET Average GD-PI: Chetana, IES and Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 123 Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana Average GD-PI: IES and Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 122 Excellent GD-PI: SIES, Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Average GD-PI: IES and Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 121 Excellent GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 120 Excellent GD-PI: Dalmia, MET, Chetana, IES Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 119 Excellent GD-PI: MET, Chetana, IES Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 118 Excellent GD-PI: Chetana, IES Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 117 Excellent GD-PI: IES Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is 116 Excellent GD-PI: IES Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Your Written Score is below 116 Excellent GD-PI: Below top 10 Average GD-PI: Below top 10 Poor GD-PI: Below top 10 Regards, Manish sir |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Now, the above thread gives you a very clear picture of the possible colleges that you could get into! At the end of the day, moral of the story is, 'Excel in GD-PI and get better college' (Now, that's common sense, isn't it? ). So stop analyzing the results further, and start preparing for your GD-PI! All the best! Regards, Manish sir |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
hello sir kumar here i am last year peakseeker student but last l got only 98 in CET but this year with one year work exp i got 132 in CET 2008 n sir i gave sies pg test also so i want ask u if i get call frm sies pg then what to do ?? means can i go mms or sies pg n according to placement and faculty wise sies mms is good or pg plz guide sir bye tc
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CET 2007 Analysis | Ajeet | CET (Maharashtra) | 53 | 10th March 2007 05:04 PM |
| CET Test 4 Analysis | Ajeet | CET (Maharashtra) | 1 | 11th February 2006 12:35 PM |
| CET Test 3 Analysis | Ajeet | CET (Maharashtra) | 1 | 4th February 2006 03:02 PM |
| CET Test 2 Analysis | Ajeet | CET (Maharashtra) | 0 | 2nd February 2006 02:25 PM |
| CET Test 1 Analysis | Ajeet | CET (Maharashtra) | 2 | 30th January 2006 09:11 PM |