We are Ready for the Analysis

Hi All,

All the faculty members are logged in and are ready to answer your queries.

Post your queries once you are ready.

Manish

[Ajeet]

The paper was largely on the lines of what most of you have solved for the past 4 weeks. With minor changes, this test was a bit on the easier side. In fact, Manish Sir of the Vile Parle Centre (26108001, 2) dubbed it "Peak Seekers Mock Test 11"

How does that word sound? Was it music to CET takers ears or a a painful area today?

[Ajeet]

Originally Posted by Rahul Zaveri

How does that word sound? Was it music to CET takers ears or a a painful area today?

Hello Rahul Sir,
What is your take on the Syllogisms in the CET today?

Manish Sir,

There were almost 3 qsts of the same kind in Data sufficiency, which went-

What is the value of the 2 digit no.
1) the difference is 9
2) the product is 0

Should the answer option be (e), none are sufficient, because the answer could be either 09 or 90, and its not possible to tell?

Bhavna.

Hi Bhavana

09 is not a two digit number. Only 1 is sufficient. The number is 90.

just like last year's test, the paper maintained varying levels of difficulty across all four types ie. Probably true - probably false, Courses of action, assumptions and logical set theory in decreasing order.

Hi Bhavana,

How was your CET paper?? Serious attempts??? Concern Areas???

[Ajeet]

Manish Sir,
On the whole what is your opinion on cut-offs? Will they rise? Will they fall?

Hello Sir,

I am not sure how to categorise my paper. Serious attempts were around 160. I may have made more silly mistakes than i think, like the one i've posted